Monday, July 20, 2020

Are You Haunted by Phantom Debts

Are You Haunted by Phantom Debts Are You Haunted by Phantom Debts? Are You Haunted by Phantom Debts?Some phantom debts are just old, uncollected debts that you forgot about. But other phantom debts are just straight-up lies told by scammers!You’re sleeping soundly in your bed when you hear a scratching noise. You figure it must just be the wind, so you try to go back to bed. You shut your eyes and attempt to let your mind wander, but the scratching at the door just gets louder and louder.You get out of bed and make your way to the door, a rising sense of dread slowly overtaking the grogginess. You look through the peephole and see a man in a suit. They don’t look to be dangerous, but you leave the latch engaged as you crack open the door, just in case.“What are you doing here?” you ask.“Someone in this house an unpaid debt. A car loan,” he explains, as he hands you a scary looking “past due” paper.“Ah, OK,” you respond as you take the paper and close the door.When you return to your bed, your best friend who sleeps across the roo m has woken up.“Who was it?” they ask.“Oh, just someone informing us about some car loan we have to pay,” you reply.Your friend gives you a look that chills you to your very bones: “But … that loan has been paid off for ten years!”Seems like you’re haunted by a phantom debt!Forgotten debts.The term “phantom debt” can apply to a few different kinds of debt. We’ll start with the more legitimate kind. These are forgotten debts that you may have thought were paid off. Or perhaps you just hadn’t heard about the debt for a while, and assumed it was dead. But dead debts can come back.“Phantom debt, or zombie debt, is a phenomenon perpetuated by debt collectors who buy debt in bulk and consumers who don’t monitor their credit reports,” warned Joy Alford-Brand (@joyalfordbrand) of NewCashView.“A phantom debt is a debt that someone owed at some point and was never resolved by the original creditor. They are usually sold along with other bad debts to debt collec tors who then try to collect on them. They can be resold multiple times, acquiring late charges and penalties along the way.”These sorts of debts tend to be a bit older.“Phantom debts are debts that are typically three years old or more, that have since been forgotten about or never existed in the first place,” explained Josh Hastings, founder of Money Life Wax (@moneylifewax).Wait a second! Debts that never existed in the first place?!Fake debts.Yes, it may not be a home visit in the middle of the night from a man in a suit, but you might get a fake debt collection call from a personal loan or other debt that never existed in the first place.“Essentially, it’s an attempt by a scammer to collect money that you  dont owe,” Tony Arevalo from clarified. “In car insurance that could be in the form of an ‘accident from several years ago’ that is still awaiting payment. Most people can be caught off guard by a sudden phone call requesting money, and might even for a split second think that they do owe money to someone.“Outside of car insurance, phantom debt scammers can find creative ways to get you to cough up your hard earned money. The most common scam is related to payday loan collections. Always beware of phone calls offering short-term and payday loans too, since they tend to be scams but of another nature.”Payday loans can be a rough ride, which is true of most short-term bad credit loans and no credit check loans (like cash advances or title loans). But a payday loan scam brings a whole new level of financial pain!Debt exorcism.So how can you deal with phantom debts? If they’re old but legitimate, you’ll probably have to deal with them the same way you’d deal with any other debt. Paying it, looking for forgiveness, or, if things are really not manageable, looking into bankruptcy.The first step is finding out if you actually have any debts you might be unaware of. This is a good idea regardless of whether you’ve be en contacted by someone claiming to be a collection agent.“The quickest way to figure out whether you have phantom debts is to use a free credit report tool such as Experians,” advised Hastings. “Your credit report will list every debt you owe since it details your credit history! As a rule of thumb, consider checking your credit history once per year to avoid phantom debts!”Knowing which debts you do and don’t owe will also be key to dealing with debt collection scams.“The number one way to know if you have a scammer on the phone is their general demeanor and attitude,” suggested Arevalo. “We all know that ‘legit’ collections agencies can use forceful tactics and dirty tricks to get you to pay them back. But a scammer will usually have a piece of personal information to try to convince you that they are familiar with your situation. Never give your bank, credit card, or other personal details unless you identify the caller.”And don’t forget: you have rights! “The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act gives you the right to request written communication only, so you can request this,” advised Arevalo. “The worst-case scenario is identity theft, and if this happens you can contact the Federal Trade Commission for help on how to recover your identity.”As long as you’re careful and always do your due diligence, you should be OK. You don’t have to fear phantom debts! To learn more about protecting your money from thieves and fraudsters, check out these related posts and articles from OppLoans:8 Tips to Spot an Online ImposterHow to Identify and Avoid Fake Tech Support Scams10 Scams That Target the ElderlyExpert Roundup: 13 Signs You’re Being ScammedDo you have a   personal finance question youd like us to answer? Let us know! You can find us  on  Facebook  and  Twitter.  |  InstagramContributorsJoy Alford-Brand (@joyalfordbrand) became a licensed attorney in North Carolina in 1999.   She has practiced bankruptcy law for 17 years. In 2015, she published a book on personal finance based on her experience as a bankruptcy attorney called Money Basics, Keeping It and Growing It.   She also founded  to teach people basic personal finance techniques to help them avoid filing for bankruptcy and learn to be financially empowered.Tony Arevalo is the Co-Founder of, a thorough car insurance review site. During his years in the property and car insurance industry he has worked with hundreds of clients and has developed in-depth knowledge of what they want and whats best for them.Josh Hastings  is a former High School Athletic Director at the secondary level who shifted his focus in 2016 to focus more effort on his entrepreneur endeavors. In 2017 he founded  (@moneylifewax), a personal finance site dedicated to helping millennials with student loans. With an emphasis on money and finance behavior, Josh started Money Life Wax  to help millennials realize there are other way s to make money and be happy in the 21st century.

Thursday, May 21, 2020

The Genocide Still Going on in Darfur, Sudan Essay examples

Not everybody believes in genocides, other may have a different opinion or thoughts. Sometimes people don’t realize its genocide because they believe in what they are doing and they think there is no harm done because it’s not affecting them. To be taken away from your family, to go live somewhere else or to be killed can have a huge impact on your life. Genocides play a huge role in the world; it has and will affect many people. In Darfur there is a genocide going on, it has been going on for a few decades now. Genocide is the mass killing of a race. The people of Darfur and the Government of Sudan didn’t really get along. The Government wanted to do oil exploration where the citizens lived. There was and still is a lot of tension between†¦show more content†¦The citizens were raising their families and animals. To me if more then one million people of the same race are killed I think it would be genocide. I also believe that it was more than just genoc ide, because it was the mass slaughtering and rape. The government didn’t need to hurt the citizens of Darfur by doing that. Now the citizens will not cooperate with the government, they will stand alone fighting for what they believe in. The citizens of Darfur were doing nothing wrong, they were minding their own business. The government begs to differ. The government wanted to use the land for oil exploration. They didn’t ask the Darfuri people to use their land, they just took over. Men, women and children were slaughtered and raped because they didn’t give up the land. The government â€Å"undertake to prevent and punish† (Raphael Lemkin pg1) which is the people of Darfur was a where of what was going on. They didn’t move their stuff they just stayed and fought in what they believed in. I believe many people would have just grabbed their valuables and taken their family and went somewhere else, but they didn’t want to do that because the ir neighbors were not leaving. In the Darfur Genocide over four million people were displaced and over two million people were killed. It may not seem like a lot of people were killed but if you think about how many people of the same race were killed then it might change your mind. People who live inShow MoreRelatedEssay about Darfurs Turning Point or Not1174 Words   |  5 PagesEvil can come in many different forms. Desmond Tutu claims this to be as he once said, â€Å"When people think of the sort of things that happen when genocide happens, its again not people who are intrinsically evil.† This quote by Desmond Tutu is a definition of evil because not everybody was born being evil it depends on a persons real nature. When many people think of evil they think of the people that they do not like or do not care for. Without people being evil are world would not be as it is todayRead MoreGenocide: A Historical Perspective Essay1462 Words   |  6 PagesAccording to Dictio Genocide is the â€Å"deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.† A few notable examples of genocide would be the War in Darfur, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Holocaust which are all among some of the worst genocides of the 20th century. The situation in Darfur is in part still going on today, while the Holocaust and Rwandan genocide are now a serious part of our world’s history. Each of these three genocides occurred due to politicalRead MoreEssay on U.S. Involvement in Darfur1886 Words   |  8 PagesThroughout history there have been many incidents in which mass murder has occurred. A modern day example of mass murder in a conflict that is ongoing is the genocides occurring in Darfur, Sudan. The corrupt government in the country supports a group called the Janjaweed, which is the militia group that is mainly responsible for the large number of Darfur residents that have been murdered, raped, or displaced (1 ). Although the exact number is not known, most sources estimate around 400,000 people have diedRead More##torical Analysis Of Elie Wiesels The Perils Of Indifference1053 Words   |  5 Pagesfrom the tragic event which is the Holocaust. Additionally, the use of imagery in the speech helps audience imagine the tragic things that has happened to the world. In paragraph 15, he describe, â€Å"that the leaders of free world did not know what was going on behind those black gates and barbed wire; that they had no knowledge of war†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Wiesel questions the other people outside the country or the people whose free did not help them and did not interfere from the start. Finally, by the use of syntax, heRead MoreGenocide : The Worst Crimes Against Humanity And It Still Continues Today2115 Words   |  9 PagesApril 2016 Genocide: Genocide is one of the worst crimes against humanity and it still continues today. The definition of the word genocide is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. Compared with war crimes and crimes against humanity, genocide is generally regarded as the most offensive crime. Unlike war, where the attack is general and the object is often the control of a geographical or political region. Genocide attacks goRead MoreGenocide in Darfur Essay2011 Words   |  9 Pagesworld, but there’s one of these conflicts that stood out from the rest, and still remains present in today’s society. This conflict is called a genocide; the deliberate and systematic extermination of a nation, racial, political or cultural group ( United States ). According to the united sates holocaust memorial museum the term genocide didn’t really come about until 1944. A Jewish- Polish lawyer coined the name genocide in 1944. He did so surfing the reign of Nazis to describe the constant murderRead MoreSouth Sudan at Risk of Genocide1469 Words   |  6 PagesGenocide in the world is very much alive and continues to happen; it is estimated that since the year 1900, more than 170 million lives have been lost. If you were to think of that in size, it would be equal to the entire population of Nigeria, gone, wiped out of existence. After the holocaust of World War II, additional steps were taken to ensure history didn’t repeat itself. The Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was held in 1948, conducted by the United NationsRead MoreRwandan Genocide1017 Words   |  5 PagesEgypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war l asted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world. Read MoreGenocides And Genocides Of The Holocaust1455 Words   |  6 PagesGenocides Occurring After the Holocaust The Holocaust was a mass murder of millions of individuals’ primary to and during World War II. â€Å"Only 54 percent of the people surveyed by the Anti- Defamation League (ADL) in a massive, global poll has ever heard of the Holocaust† (Wiener-Bronner). The Holocaust was from 1933-1945 and was run by German leader named Adolf Hitler. Hitler was a man who wanted to create his own race of people. Therefore to create this race, he wiped out anyone who did not haveRead MoreThe Holocaust : A Mass Murder Of Millions Of Individuals1448 Words   |  6 Pageselders were the first to die because they were not mentally fit for the work they were going to be given. People who passed the selection process either died by starvation, disease, fatigue, or assassination. It took twelve years before anyone intervened and by then it was too late for millions of people. Even though over twelve million people died during the Holocaust, genocides have still happened in Rwanda, Darfur and Cambodia. Rwanda is a country in East Africa, which has had a mass killing with

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Use of Color in Cranes The Red Badge of Courage Essay

Use of Color in Cranes The Red Badge of Courage The Red Badge of Courage uses both color imagery and color symbols. While Crane uses color to describe, he also allows it to stand for whole concepts. Gray, for example, describes the both the literal image of a dead soldier and Henry Flemings vision of the sleeping soldiers as corpses and comes to stand for the idea of death. In the same way, red describes both the soldiers physical wounds and Flemings mental visions of battle. In the process, it gains a symbolic meaning which Crane will put to an icon like the red badge of courage (110, Penguin ed., 1983). Crane uses color in his descriptions of the physical and the metaphysical and allows color to take on meanings ranging from the†¦show more content†¦Obviously, the fires are red. But Fleming characterizes the blazes as the enemys glowing eyes. He continues this metaphor in the next chapter: From across the river the deep red eyes were still peering (58). Crane then transforms this metaphor into a conceit used throughout the text: Staring once at the red eyes across the river, he conceived then to be growing larger, as the orbs of a row of dragons advancing (59). The red of the campfires comes to represent eyes of the enemy, of dragons. The monstrous dragons are, indeed, the opposing army: The dragons were coming with invincible strides. The army, helpless in the matted thickets and blinded by the overhanging night, was going to be swallowed. War, the red animal, war, the blood swollen god, would have his fill (130). Flemings metaphysical images of war, in all of their forms, are essentially red. First there is the aforementioned red animal, war, the blood swollen god (71). This icon, for Fleming, rules over and feasts on the battles. Battles themselves are a crimson roar; the screams, the gunfire, the killing sounds red to Fleming. In the same way, the historical battles set forth in the Iliad, the Aenid, and other texts read as crimson blotches on the pages of the past (103, 46). The red world of battle is much like the red world of Hell. Crane seems to make this connection with a prisoners curse for his captors: He consigned them to the red regions.Show MoreRelated Stephen Cranes Red Badge of Courage Essay1237 Words   |  5 PagesStephen Cranes Red Badge of Courage   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  When reading the Red Badge of Courage, it is necessary to understand the symbolism that Stephen Crane has created throughout the whole book. Without understanding the true intent of color use, this book loses a meaningful interpretation that is needed to truly understand the main character, his feelings and actions. Crane uses very distinct colors in his text to represent various elements that the main character, Henry or â€Å"the youth†, is feeling alongRead MoreEssay on From Fear to Courage1195 Words   |  5 PagesFrom Fear to Courage When new soldiers go to fight in a war, they never know what’s coming. Although events are preserved in stories by the veterans, nothing can capture the real thing. Seeing everything up close and personal can change a person dramatically. Soldiers may never be the same after traumatic events such as these. Wars test a person and shows how strong not just physically, but mentally, one is. Stephen Crane, throughout his novel, The Red Badge of Courage, creates three distinctRead MoreRed Badge of Courage Research Paper2181 Words   |  9 PagesPsychology of Men at War THESIS STATEMENT: The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane exhibits how the desensitizing, dehumanizing, and depressing experience of war is more so mentally harmful, than it is physically harmful. I. Introduction II. War is seen as the universal sign of manhood. A. War is seen as a rite of passage into manhood for boys. B. Henry went as far as pretending to be shot just to make the other soldiers think of him as brave. III. War will change a persons attitudeRead MoreRed Badge of Courage Book Report.1765 Words   |  8 PagesThe Red Badge of Courage is a fictional story of a young soldier named Henry Fleming, who finds himself by overcoming his inner fears in a series of events during the Civil War. Henry is an average farm boy from New York, who dreams of being a true war hero. He has enlisted in the 304th New York regiment, which fights for the Unionist forces. The rising action for this novel is of Henry trying to overcome his struggle with courage. This changes when a dear friend, Jim, dies right before his eyesRead More Comparing Maturation in Catcher in the Rye and Red Badge of Courage1421 Words   |  6 PagesMaturation in Catcher in the Rye and Red Badge of Courage    The Catcher in the Rye and The Red Badge of Courage detail the gradual maturation of two immature boys into self-reliant young men. The steady speed at which Salingerà ­s and Craneà ­s language streams enables the reader to see the independent events that lead up to the ultimate rite of passage for both Henry and Holden. Although the pinnacle of maturity Holden reached concerned his pessimistic view of the world and Henryà ­s was a unifyingRead MoreCatcher in the Rye and Red Badge of Courage - the Maturation of Holden1325 Words   |  6 PagesThe Catcher in the Rye and The Red Badge of Courage detail the gradual maturation of two immature boys into self-reliant young men. The steady speed at which Salingers and Cranes language streams enables the reader to see the independent events that lead up to the ultimate rite of passage for both Henry and Holden. Although the pinnacle of maturity Holden reached concerned his pessimistic view of the world and Henrys was a unifying moment o f bravery, both boys experienced an epiphany over theRead MoreThe Red Badge Of Courage By Stephen Crane1152 Words   |  5 PagesThe Red Badge of Courage, by Stephen Crane, is a fictional novel that portrays the Civil War through the life of Henry Fleming, a young soldier. The reader follows Henry’s coming of age story through a strand of events and choices. The fashion in which Crane develops Henry’s story, is by using distinctive literary techniques to establish the theme of courage throughout the novel. Henry, as the main character, would not have developed over the course of the novel without Crane’s use of courage. OneRead MoreEssay on Naturalism in Stephen Cranes Maggie: A Girl of the Streets1111 Words   |  5 PagesNaturalism in Stephen Cranes Maggie: A Girl of the Streets Stephen Cranes interpretations of life are spawned from his own opinions of the world. These opinions correspond with naturalistic train of thought. He makes use of an observation technique to show the natural law of the universe: One can either accept the laws determining social order or become their victim. In the Novella, Maggie is used as a medium to paint the picture of the devastating consequences that befall one who attemptsRead MoreAnalysis Of The Red Badge Of Courage4842 Words   |  20 Pageswas writing The Red Badge of Courage. His novel shows the differences between the reality of the situations Harry is in and the glorious way other books would portray it. Harry thinks he will receive a sendoff from the town and be looked at as a hero. His mother instead says The Lord s will be done and continues milking the cow. The Red Badge of Courage and First-Hand Accounts of War First Person Locate a brief passage (about a paragraph in length) from The Red Badge of Courage that de scribes aRead More Man and Nature in Stephen Cranes The Blue Hotel and The Open Boat2651 Words   |  11 PagesMan and Nature in The Blue Hotel and The Open Boat   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Stephen Crane uses a massive, ominous stove, sprawled out in a tiny room and burning with god-like violence, as a principal metaphor to communicate his interpretation of the world. Full of nearly restrained energy, the torrid stove is a symbol of the burning, potentially eruptive earth to which humans cling and of which they are a part. As a literary naturalist, Crane interpreted reality from a Darwinian perspective, and saw

The Road Free Essays

string(124) " to a boy with a big sense of humanity, who knows a lot about the world he lives in and feels responsible for other people\." The post-apocalyptic novel â€Å"The Road†, written by Cormac McCarthy was published in 2006. [1] It deals with the journey of a father together with his son, who try to reach the coast after America, its nature and civilisation has been destroyed by some catastrophe. Therefore some important issues are implied: travelling, fear of death, nuclear war, goodness, religion, cannibalism and of course the relationship between father and son. We will write a custom essay sample on The Road or any similar topic only for you Order Now Maybe that is the reason why McCarthy dedicated the novel to his son: John Francis McCarthy. In 2007 McCarthy won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction for this novel. 2] In 2009 the Novel was made into a film, also called â€Å"The Road† and directed by John Hillcoat. [3] There are some interesting aspects, regarding the similarities and differences between the novel and its cinematic adaptation. The Novel Cormac McCarthy tells the story of a journey, made by father and son. They survived a nuclear catastrophe, which is not described in detail and want to go south in order to reach the coast. They have a card in order to carry their habits. They hope for a humanitarian climate, nourishments and other peaceful survivors. Due to the apocalypse, they have to deal with a lot of trouble during their trip. In order to survive despite the lack of food, a lot of people became cannibals. Cannibalism is no option for the man and his son, because they belong to the good ones. Therefore they have to be carful who they trust and their search for food is more difficult. In addition they have to take care for their clothing, especially for their shoes because it is very cold since the catastrophe. [4] â€Å"Mostly he worried about their shoes. That and food. Always food. † (McCarthy, 2006: 17) [5] The most problematic aspect is the fathers task to raise his son under such circumstances without neglecting the sense of humanness. The world he knows was completely destroyed and there is no common childhood. The son has to cope with aspects like cannibalism and suicide very early. He also has to accept the circumstance, that his father is going to die sooner or later and that he needs to be able to live on his own when the time comes. His father tries to prepare him as good as he can. McCarthy tells the story among 287 pages. He uses 3rd person narration, where the narrator is omniscient, because he knows about thoughts, dreams and fears of the father and his son. His style of writing without chapters stresses the travel motive. It highlights the fact that the protagonists have to go on and on until they reach the coast and that there are no other important stages in between. Another important technique is the avoidance of names which means that both protagonists remain anonym. This technique highlights the aspect, that in case of a nuclear catastrophe, this scenario could happen to anyone. The father and his son serve as representatives for humankind. In addition there are no concrete names of places which indicates, that this scenario could not just happen to anyone, it could also happen anywhere in the world. There are two more aspects, which remain unclear. The first one is the fate of the mother. The book does not make clear what happened to her because for them, it does not matter. She is gone and that is all they need to know. Secondly there are no details mentioned when it comes to the catastrophe which also indicates that it is not important what happened. The man and his son are alive and so they have to challenge the circumstances, indifferent what caused them. â€Å"The clocks stopped at 1:17. A long shear of light and then a series of low concussions. (†¦) A dull rose glow in the windowglas. (McCarthy, 2006: 52) McCarthy creates a very desperate imagery. His preferred chosen words are dark and sad. He uses short sentences, which guarantees that the novel is written in a minimal, but tough very closely style. [6] â€Å"No list of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one’s heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes. † (McCarthy, 2006: 54) Even the dialogues between father and son or between them and strangers they met are very short. In addition there are a lot of details described, no matter if they are tolerable or hardly shocking. â€Å"They could smell something cooking. Let’s circle around, the man said. (†¦) They left their food cooking. (†¦) What is it? He said. What is it? The boy shook his head. Oh Papa, he said. He turned and looked again. What the bay had seen was a charred human infant headless and gutted and blackening on the spit. † (McCarthy, 2006: 198) The two unnamed Protagonists The son is about 10 years old and was born after the catastrophe. That is why he does not know the world as it was before. He has although no childhood like one would think of. He has to grow up without his mom, knowing that his father will also fade away one day. Therefore he has to learn very much important skills in a short amount of time. He has no real toys and no other kids around him. In contrast he knows how to kill himself and feels responsible for his father, who became ill. It is important to say, that the son serves as a symbol for hope. â€Å"He knew only that the child was his warrant. He said: If he is not the word of God God never spoke. † (McCarthy, 2006: 5) Not only for his father, also for other people they met. For example Ely, the second stranger they met thought that he was an angel. Within the story the young boy grows from a child with a lot of questions and fears to a boy with a big sense of humanity, who knows a lot about the world he lives in and feels responsible for other people. You read "The Road" in category "Papers" â€Å"The man squatted and looked at him. I’m scared, he said. Do you understand? I’m scared. (†¦) You’re not the one who has to worry about everything. The boy said something but he couldn’t understand him. What? he aid. He looked up, his wet and grimy face. Yes I am, he said. I am the one. † (McCarthy, 2006: 259) The father can be characterized as a reactor. Whenever it comes to violent actions he is just acting in self-defence. He knows the world as it has been before the catastrophe, and feels sorry for his son but he also knows that he can not hold the horror away f rom him. He faces the fact that his son has to live on his own one day and that it is his job to make sure that he will be able to do so. Therefore he is distrustful when it comes to strangers. He always reminds his son to be less helpful and a bit more wary but often he does not succeed. In addition he is very ill and weak. The only reason why he is able to go on without committing suicide is his son. Everything he does is for him. â€Å"He held the boy close to him. So thin. My heart, he said. My heart. But he knew that if he were a good father still it might well be as she had said. That the boy was all that stood between him and death. † (McCarthy, 2006: 29) Ending The ending of the novel is a happy one. They manage to reach the coast and the father dies in peace. After some days other survivors appear. There is another man, a woman and two other children, a boy and a girl. The boy talks to the man and makes clear that they belong to the good guys who â€Å"carry the fire†, which means that they do not kill and eat other people. After he made that clear, it is okay for him to go with them. Therefore the ending implies a new beginning, because it could be possible that the boy and the girl create descendants one day, which would be a first step to get a new population. â€Å"The woman when he saw him put her arms around him and held him. (†¦) I am so glad to see you. She would talk to him sometimes about God. He tried to talk to God but the best thing was to talk to his father and he did talk to him and he didn’t forget. † (McCarthy, 2006: 286) The Movie The movie â€Å"The Road† was published in 2009. John Hillcoat (Director) and Joe Penhall (Screenplay) produced a cinematic adaptation of the novel with the same title and story which takes 111 minutes. The role of the father is played by Viggo Mortensen and Kodi Smit-McPhee plays the role of the son. [7] As already said, the story is almost the same. There are just a few changes within it. For example there are some flashbacks to the time before the catastrophe and shortly after it, when the mother was still alive. In addition there are some omissions because of details which would have been too shocking, like the passage with the infant corpse. [8] Despite those supplements and omissions Hillcoat and Penhall did a really good job. They managed it to copy the imagery of McCarthy’s special style of writing into the atmosphere of the film. Therefore they used a number of techniques. [9] The depressive and sad atmosphere is easily created by mostly grey and brown colours. Furthermore the film was produced in wintertime, when there automatically lies snow and the trees are without leaves. The film implies no ordinary scenery, because it is not a complex story. The contrast comes when the flashbacks to the time before the catastrophe are shown. The colours change into very intensive ones, it is summer and you always hear nice piano music. One could also argue that the piano serves as a symbol for the presence of the mother and for civilisation because it represents culture. When the father remembers his wife there is always piano music which accentuates the scenes. Later in the film he has to cut an old piano into pieces in order to get wood for a fire. This is a clear indication that he is angry with his wife because of her decision to commit suicide. Those scenes are different to the few passages about the mother in the book. She is not a big issue in the novel. Within the book the story is told by an omniscient 3rd person narrator. In the cinematic adaptation the man tells the story. This is a contrast to the book, where the actions, feelings and thoughts of the man are part of the narration. On the one hand one could argue that this contrast is problematic because in the end the father is going to die and the way of narration could be too personal. But on the other hand Hillcoat and Penhall had to choose someone who tells the story and they had no other opportunity if they want to have the option of flashbacks and omniscience. According to the protagonists there is one other existing difference. In the book the boy seems to accept his fate and tries to make the best out of it. He grows up very fast and is rather adulty than childish. In the film he collects some artefacts like a broken comb of his mother, wears her clothes and also has a few toys. He is often scared and cries when he is. All in all, the boy is played like a child and not as grown up as he is described in the book. The overlapping aspect is the importance of â€Å"to carry the fire†. He is always asking if someone carries the fire, which means not to kill other people and disregard morality and values. The biggest difference between the novel and its cinematic adaptation is the ending. In the book it is described as a happy end. The father dies, the son meets another family who also carries the fire and can go with them. In addition the family has a daughter, which means that there is a new beginning for civilisation implied. This procedure is the same at the end of the film but there are some details which change the situation. Firstly the thumbs of the veteran are missing or garbled. That was also the case when they met the thief who has stolen their cart with all their goods. Those missing fingers can lead to the suggestion that he had been a member of a cannibalism commune. This would also fit to the question why a family should voluntary incorporate another hungry child. In fact there is no food left and every additional person is a risk at the same time. One also has to remember that they have a dog in the movie, which is pure luxury according to the circumstances they live in. According to those details there are two possibilities: either they are just as friendly and careful as the boy and it is an act of charity, or they see their chance in getting extra food without killing someone of their family or group. Novel or Movie? In my opinion both works are really great. I like the novel of McCarthy very much because of his style of writing and the atmosphere within the story. The dialogues are short, concise and therefore fit totally in. In addition the characters with their actions, thoughts, feelings and dreams as well as the ending of the story are simply realistic. There are some differences when it comes to the cinematic adaptation but those are no reasons for regarding the film as inferior. As already said, I think that Hillcoat and Penhall did a great job because it must have been very hard to transport McCarthy’s style of writing into a movie. What I like most is the ending of the film. It is less clear than in the book and every viewer can decide which option seems to be more realistic. I think the interpretation of the ending refers to ones personal character traits. If the viewer is as prudent, distrusting and sometimes hopeless like the father he will maybe be more likely to see it critical. In contrast a viewer who is as optimistic as the son will probably see the details as unimportant and therefore recognize the ending as a happy end, like the one of the book. This opportunity of individual interpretation is a great aspect of the movie. Bibliography McCarthy, Comac. The Road. New York: Vintage Books, 2006–thriller/the-road/mccarthy-cormac/products_products/detail/prod_id/22749892/session/0c16e28341622398e76f09549b0dc89c/ (23.02.2012) (23.02.2012) (23.02.2012) (23.02.2012) (23.02.2012) (25.02.2012) Movie: â€Å"The Road†, Universum Film GmbH: 2009 (25.02.2012) How to cite The Road, Papers The Road Free Essays Why do you think McCarthy has chosen not to give his characters names? How do the generic labels of â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy† affect the way you /readers relate to them? While reading The Road, a novel written by Cormac McCarthy, I was jerked from the warmth, comfort, and safety of my home and thrown into a cold, dark, and desolate world, walking alongside â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy†. McCarthy composes his work so graphically that readers are drawn right into the story. I believe Cormac McCarthy wanted the figures in this book to be universal, so that the reader could imagine him/her self as â€Å"the boy† or â€Å"the man† at any given moment, and to be able to feel as they do. We will write a custom essay sample on The Road or any similar topic only for you Order Now To do this McCarthy did not designate the characters in his book with names, and because of this, I was able to connect with â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy† on a personal level and envision myself uniting with them in their chilling journey. As the reader, I was deeply overwhelmed with many mixed emotions such as compassion, sadness, happiness, disgust, remorse, and fear. I have pity for the characters in the book The Road, because â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy† have to pass day to day struggling to survive in a frigid bleak world where food is scarce â€Å"They squatted in the road and ate rice and cold beans they’d cooked days ago. † â€Å"Already beginning to ferment. †(McCarthy 29). The landscape is blackened, and mankind is almost extinct â€Å"The mummied dead everywhere. †(McCarthy 24). As I read on I noticed myself connecting more deeply with the characters. When the boy’s mother takes her own life, I was deeply saddened and my heart broke for â€Å"the boy† simply because his mom, someone he cherished and loved so much, had given up on hope and faith and deserted him. I just wanted to take hold of the child and comfort him even though at this moment he has no clue his mother has left. I also felt sorry for â€Å"the man†, one, because he has to tell his child where his mother is â€Å"For the love of God woman. What am I to tell him? † (McCarthy 58), and two, because his love and best friend was in such despair and there was nothing he could do to impel her to stay. As a mother, in some ways, I also felt sorry for the mother in this book, because most women dream of the day she will have a child of her own to love, care for, and teach, but this mother had to give birth to her son after the great catastrophe, and instead of bringing her tears of happiness, it brought tears of sorrow. She now knows that she has to raise her son in this dark and barley habitable world and that it will be a constant struggle to survive. â€Å"My heart was ripped out of me the night he was born†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (McCarthy 57). On the other hand though, I am also disgusted with the mother for the one reason that she gave up, and now her family, especially her child, has to suffer the consequences due to her actions, but again, given that I put myself in her situation, would I do the same thing? While reading I also felt deep sadness in many parts, for one instance, when â€Å"the man† dies, at this point in the book I had tears streaming down my face. â€Å"He slept close to his father that night and held him but when he woke in the morning his father was cold and stiff. † â€Å"He sat there a long time weeping†¦ (McCarthy 281). â€Å"He knelt beside his father held his cold hand and said his name over and over again. †(McCarthy 281). At one part in the book, remorse, disgust, sadness, and compassion were the stirred emotions that hit me all t once. It was the time when a thief robs â€Å"the boy† while he is asleep on the beach. When â€Å"the boy† was first robbed I was angry and disgusted with the thief who had robbed a sleeping innocent child, I could never see myself doing this especially in a situation where food is hard to come by and staying warm is almost impossible! When they finally catch up with the thief â€Å"the man† points the gun at him and threatens to shoot him. â€Å"The boy† is pleading with his father not to kill the thief. â€Å"The man† says to the thief â€Å"Take your clothes off. †(McCarthy 256). â€Å"Take them off every goddamn stitch. † (McCarthy 256). Eventually the thief is completely naked, â€Å"the boy† and the thief are begging â€Å"the man† not to do this, but the man looks at the thief and says â€Å"You didn’t mind doing it to us. †(McCarthy 257). Now I feel that the thief is getting what he deserves. When they leave the thief standing in the road â€Å"the boy† becomes extremely upset, â€Å"And They set out along south with the boy crying and looking back at the nude and saltlike creature standing there in the road shivering and hugging himself. † â€Å"Oh Papa, he sobbed. †(McCarthy 258). I am now starting to feel the compassion the boy has towards the thief â€Å"He was hungry, Papa. † â€Å"He’s going to die. †(McCarthy 259). They finally take the thief’s clothes back and pile them in the middle of the road and I am glad of this. Later as they were lying down at camp I believe the man was starting to feel guilty, and he spoke â€Å"I wasnt going to kill him, he said. † â€Å"But the boy didnt answer. † â€Å"They rolled themselves in the blankets and lay there in the dark. † â€Å"He could tell the boy was awake and after a while the boy said: but we did kill him. †(McCarthy 260). When â€Å"the boy† made this comment I felt deep remorse and disgust in myself for having felt so harshly toward the thief in the beginning. I also felt happiness and relief in this story when â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy† found the underground shelter behind the house in the field, I felt as if I was there with them discovering the grand riches this den held! â€Å"Oh my God, he whispered. † â€Å"Oh my God. † â€Å"What is it Papa? † â€Å"Come down. † â€Å"Oh my God. † â€Å"Come down. † (McCarthy138). â€Å"Crate upon crate of canned goods. † â€Å"Tomatoes, peaches, beans, apricots. † â€Å"Canned hams. † â€Å"Corned beef. † â€Å"Hundreds of gallons of water in ten gallon plastic jerry jugs. †(McCarthy 138). In this underground hideaway was everything they needed to survive. I was so overwhelmed with joy and comfort that I forgot for a moment about the cruel cold world above. During many portions of this novel I experienced also many sensations of fear. The most prominent passage is where â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy† come across a house and both are vulnerable due to fatigue and starvation. â€Å"They’d had no food and little sleep in five days and in this condition on the outskirts of a small town they came upon a once grand house sited on a rise above the road†(McCarthy 105). As they start toward the house â€Å"the boy† becomes frightened and â€Å"the man† or father tries to reassure him that everything is okay and that they have to go inside. At this point I am feeling a little uneasy about the two entering the house. As they cross the porch â€Å"the boy† is trying to convince his father not to go inside, agreeing with the boy I imagine myself in his shoes and I am pleading for â€Å"the man† not to enter. â€Å"The man† is determined and tells the boy â€Å"We’ve got to find something to eat. † â€Å"We have no choice. †(McCarthy 106). When inside the home â€Å"the boy hung on to his hand. † â€Å"He was terrified. † (McCarthy 107). While investigating the house they come across a door in a room next to the kitchen that might have been considered a pantry at one time. â€Å"In the floor of this room was a door or hatch and it was locked with a large padlock made of stacked steel plates. †(McCarthy 108). â€Å"The boy† again tries to plead with his father to leave, and I again right along with him, but now my tension and curiosity is starting to rise a bit, wondering what is underneath this door. The man† believes there is a significant reason for this door being locked, so he makes his way to the tool shed â€Å"half dragging the child and went sorting through tools† (McCarthy 109). He retrieves a shovel, heads back into the house, and pry’s the door open. Now I am holding my breath just waiting for the outcome, good or bad, I do not know, but I am very anxious. â₠¬Å"He started down he rough wooden steps. He ducked his head and then flicked the lighter†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (McCarthy 110). â€Å"Coldness and Damp. † â€Å"An ungodly stench. † (McCarthy 110). What came next caught me completely off guard! Huddled against the back wall were naked people, male and female, all trying to hide, shielding their faces with their hands. † â€Å"On the mattress lay a man with his legs gone to the hip and the stumps of them blackened and burnt. † â€Å"The smell was hideous. † â€Å"Jesus, he whispered. †(McCarthy 110). Now I am in a complete state of shock, fear, and disgust. Unbelievable! All at once I am feeling the fear and shock of â€Å"the man†, â€Å"the boy†, and the mangled victims that have been terrorized, probably raped, eaten or at least half dismembered and eaten by the wicked and ruthless barbarians! Then one by one they turned and blinked in the pitiful light. † â€Å"Help us, they whispered. † â€Å"Please help us. †(McCarthy 110). My heart is now beginning to race. When they finally reac h the top of this grave, â€Å"He shoved the boy through the hatch and sent him sprawling. † â€Å"He stood and got hold of the door and swung it over and let it slam down and he turned to grab the boy but the boy had gotten up and was doing his little dance of terror. †(McCarthy 111). As if this horrific and vivid image engraved in my head was not enough, McCarthy immediately throws me into a sheer state of terror and panic. â€Å"†¦ the boy was pointing out the window and when he looked he went cold all over. † â€Å"Coming across the field toward the house were four bearded men and two women. † â€Å"He grabbed the boy by the hand. † â€Å"Christ, he said. † â€Å"Run. † â€Å"Run. † I had to literally set the book aside, go outdoors, calm down, and smoke a cigarette to calm my nerves. Finally my heart rate returned to normal and I picked up the book and continued to read. After I completed this part in the story and discovered that â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy† had escaped I got up checked on my children to reassure myself that they were asleep safe and warm in their bed, I quickly ran back through the house like a child with a sense of fear that something was going to jump out and grab me at any moment, I jumped in the bed got as close to my husband as possible and eventually drifted off to sleep. When I finished reading The Road by Cormac McCarthy, I was astonished at how deep I was able to connect with the characters and the fact that this book touched me as deeply as it did. It also made me think what if†¦? In reality if this were to happen would I have the courage and strength of â€Å"the man† and â€Å"the boy† or would I be like the mother as McCarthy states it â€Å" †¦a faithless slut†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (57), who has taken death as a new lover. Over all I personally believe that this novel was absolutely fantastic, even though I had nightmares for a few nights after I had completed the book. This just goes to show what a great writer McCarthy is, he touches his readers so deeply they even dream about his work. I would defiantly pick up this book and read it again just for fun. How to cite The Road, Papers

Sunday, April 26, 2020

What was Plato8217s worldview and how do humans ex Essay Example For Students

What was Plato8217s worldview and how do humans ex Essay ist within it Plato lived in a very exciting time in history. The post-Socratic era had merits for exploration totally new to him. The idea that science and reason could be applied to more than static issues such as logistics and geometry, allowing the thinking men of the time the opportunity to examine the world around them with structured thought. He, like his mentor, was not happy with what science gave as answers to life. Though it gave a structure the world, It denoted a typically atheist view on the world. We will write a custom essay on What was Plato8217s worldview and how do humans ex specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Plato had strong ideas about right and wrong, and other abstract ideas in general, but could not relinquish such a powerful tool as scientific reason or Grecian theories on the atomic nature of the world, so used them in his work. One of Platos core philosophies was what he called The Forms. He postulated a duality that spanned the planes of human existence. The world around him was made entirely of crude matter that could only represent the purity of the next life, in the plane of the forms. If we examine any object (for arguments sake a glass) we should be able to identify what it is without having to think to hard. It is our ability to connect objects that arent atomically identical to the same ilk that Plato found fascinating. How does a common understanding of what is glass arise? We could scorn any deeper meaning of this by saying that we can tell a glass is a glass by examining its function, but then consider common ideas such as justice. Even in cross-cultural examination common human concepts can be found. To Plato they were proof of a common human existence before this one, where these notions were first given to us. Thus was born the plane of the forms. Plato concluded that the corporeal world was illusionary on this principle. He thought that the world (his world of shadows) was merely a corruption of the reality of forms that exists for us before and after. All the worrying about the matters that concern us in our earthly lives only distracts the pursuit of happiness and wisdom that Plato saw as the purpose of life. He took this further when he went on to describe the relationship between the body and the soul. In Christian philosophy the body is the corporeal perfection that houses an equally perfect (though intangible) soul. Both are human; both are perfect; both come from a divine God. To Plato however the body was scorned as a crude vessel for a form of a person. It had some benefits that cannot be ignored, the possibilities for family, wealth and earthly happiness, but these paled in comparison to the world of the forms. Plato conceded to say that although there is no inherit evil in these pleasures, they should only be indulged minimally as the truer gift in life is to seek the form inside us. Platos belief was that we are all representations of the pure form of ourselves that existed in the life before, and as soon as we are born we start to corrupt (in modern thinking, the development of filters), mutating the ideals and spiritual luggage we carried inside us in our transition from the life before. . This is how isolated peoples on earth form similar ideas about justice, and what it means to treat people well. It is the body that causes this mutation of ideas. One of the core principles as to why the body is not to be taken as the be all and end all of existence unfortunately relies on now archaic Grecian scientific knowledge. .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 , .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .postImageUrl , .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 , .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034:hover , .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034:visited , .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034:active { border:0!important; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034:active , .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034 .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub374d60c2fbccaf23d04e2d3977e6034:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Against Affirmative Action Essay One of the Greeks crowning achievements was the concept of indivisibles, or atoms, as we know them today. The idea of things that are elementary to material existence being imperishable, due to their very nature, was eagerly adopted by Plato. He argued that the body, being made up of many smaller units, would soon disassemble. This gives material life the temporary and unimportant spin the Plato had searched to explain properly. This meant that any beauty in the world was less than it could .

Wednesday, March 18, 2020

Vietnam riots essays

Vietnam riots essays The Vietnam War is one of the most unique wars ever fought by the United States. It had no official beginning or ending and it was also never really declared a war. During the anti-war demonstrations of the 1960's and 1970's the police were right in the middle. The anti-Vietnam war demonstrations tarnished the image of the police and they were forced to play devils advocate. A good example of this is during the Democratic Party Presidential Convention in Chicago. The protesters became uncontrollable and the police had to intervene because it is part of their job description to maintain law and order. Even though the first amendment guarantees the right to freedom of speech and assembly, this kind of behavior is inexcusable. The protesters at the Democratic Party Presidential Convention behaved in an unruly manner, particularly when they attempted to enter the convention unlawfully. In a situation like this, law enforcement had no other alternative but to react. Many condemned the behavior of the police and called them unfair, while others agreed that they were doing their job. In addition to this, the police was also placed in the middle, at the anti-war college campuses demonstrations. One of the most widely publicized campus protests was the take over at Columbia University in New York, in the spring of 1968. (Dempsey, Frost P.G 21) The students used all of the tactics that were used in previous protests and as negations between administration and students broke down the protestors became uncontrollable. The police was once again called in to control the situation and forced to be in the middle. Most of the demonstrations were disorderly and the police was called to control the protesters. The firebombing of a University of Wisconsin building was a good example of how uncontrollable the demonstrations were. This incident started a wave of college campus bombings and arson. Six student...

Monday, March 2, 2020

Semantics and Connotations

Semantics and Connotations Semantics and Connotations Semantics and Connotations By Maeve Maddox A reader found himself puzzling over the grammatical number of the word semantics: I just had to rewrite a sentence: â€Å"The semantics are a problem† vs. â€Å"The semantics is a problem.†Ã‚   My dictionary demurs, explaining that the form of semantics  is plural though the number is singular or plural, depending on the sense.    No matter which way I wrote it, someone would think Im wrong, so I changed it (for the better maybe to the clearer, if longer, connotations of the word). [Please] write about how youd make the choice, and how other plural-looking words should be used. I cannot glean context from the examples the writer has given, but I can say that the noun semantics takes a singular verb: â€Å"Semantics is a branch of study that fascinates me.† The OED does not have an entry for semantic as a noun, but Merriam-Webster offers a noun entry that defines singular semantic as â€Å"a system or theory of meaning.† If this definition is intended, then one might say, â€Å"the semantics (systems/theories) are a problem.† Avoiding the choice of agreement by changing semantics to â€Å"connotations of the word† is not an effective solution. Although connotation is an aspect of semantics, connotation is not a synonym for semantics. Words have denotation and connotation. Denotation is the usual meaning of word. Connotation is a sense that is not present in the definition, but is implied. For example, the words house, mansion, hovel, and hut all have the semantic meaning (denotation) of â€Å"structure in which people dwell,† but mansion connotes wealth, hut connotes a temporary or badly built structure, and hovel connotes squalid poverty. Only house is relatively free of connotation. The two most usual meanings of semantics I’m familiar with are these: 1. semantics noun: The study of meaning. 2. semantics noun: The meaning or the interpretation of a word, sentence, or other language form. M-W offers a third definition- one that I usually attach to the word rhetoric: â€Å"the language used (as in advertising or political propaganda) to achieve a desired effect on an audience.† The word semantics is popular in the media. Sometimes it is used accurately, in reference to the meaning of words, but often it is used where language, terminology, rhetoric, or, yes, connotation, would perhaps be a better choice. Note: The question about other words that end in -ics will be addressed in another post. Related post: Embezzlement, Peculation, and Connotation Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Compared "to" or Compared "with"?8 Writing Tips for BeginnersPassed vs Past